From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18794 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 17:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18759 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 17:22:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050923172238.18757.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dj at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050909180045.23799.schwab@suse.de> References: <20050909180045.23799.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/23799] [4.1 regression] ICE: no-op convert from 8 to 4 bytes in initializer X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02858.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dj at redhat dot com 2005-09-23 17:22 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE: no-op convert from 8 to 4 bytes in initializer I recall that the opposite case is problematic; initializing a large int from a smaller one, because gcc always zero pads at the end. Perhaps a lt/gt comparison would be more appropriate? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23799