From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14768 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 19:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14745 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 19:12:54 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050923191254.14744.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "segalemb at usp dot br" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050914184726.23884.segalemb@usp.br> References: <20050914184726.23884.segalemb@usp.br> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/23884] failure in gcc X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02862.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From segalemb at usp dot br 2005-09-23 19:12 ------- Subject: Re: failure in gcc I and another person searched carrefully the source code and there is no repeated data commands. Sergio Citando pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org : > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 > 19:29 ------- > Reduced testcase: > module param > double precision mutdefc(8,5,7) > data mutdefc(1,1,7) /0.0000d0/ > * mutdefc(1,1,7) /0.0000d0/ > end module param > > But this is really a dup of bug 17737 > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17737 *** > > -- > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|WAITING |RESOLVED > Resolution| |DUPLICATE > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23884 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23884