public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen
@ 2005-02-23 20:38 sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:41 ` [Bug c++/20173] " sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de @ 2005-02-23 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
attaching testcase.
result should be '1', but is '2', an int is matched to a pointer.
(and the pointer has the value of the integer in the function)
is known to fail for 3.3.5 and 3.4.4.
I can't test with 4.0 atm but I think it also fails because I came across this
by a strange internal tree generated by 4.0.
--
Summary: Wrong template function specialization chosen
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] Wrong template function specialization chosen
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
@ 2005-02-23 20:41 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:43 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de @ 2005-02-23 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de 2005-02-23 17:16 -------
Created an attachment (id=8266)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8266&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] Wrong template function specialization chosen
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:41 ` [Bug c++/20173] " sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
@ 2005-02-23 20:43 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de @ 2005-02-23 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de 2005-02-23 17:19 -------
Comeau C++ thinks this code is invalid.
If it's right, this bug might be related to #20157
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] Wrong template function specialization chosen
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:41 ` [Bug c++/20173] " sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:43 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
@ 2005-02-23 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-28 22:11 ` [Bug c++/20173] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function bangerth at dealii dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-23 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #8266|text/x-c++src |text/plain
mime type| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-23 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-28 22:11 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-04-09 10:59 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-02-28 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-02-28 15:53 -------
I believe the code is invalid: you try to do a partial specialization of
a member function, but there is no such thing -- you need to use an overload
instead. To me this looks like an accept-invalid. Here's what icc has to
say:
g/x> icc -Xc -ansi -c x.cc
x.cc(10): error: declaration is incompatible with function template "void
A<AT>::function(T) [with AT=int]" (declared at line 5)
void A<int>::function(TTT *){std::cerr << '2';}
^
x.cc(16): warning #592: variable "b" is used before its value is set
a.function(b);
^
compilation aborted for x.cc (code 2)
This also seems like a regression to me, since gcc2.95.3 gives me this:
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-2*/bin/c++ -c x.cc -ansi -pedantic
x.cc:10: template parameters specified in specialization
x.cc:10: prototype for `void A<int>::function(TTT *)' does not match any in
class `A<int>'
x.cc:5: candidate is: template <class T> void A<int>::function<T>(T)
x.cc: In method `void A<int>::function(TTT *)':
x.cc:10: must specialize `struct A<int>' before defining member `void
A<int>::function(TTT *)'
x.cc:10: template definition of non-template `void A<int>::function(TTT *)'
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Known to fail| |3.2.3 3.3.5 3.4.3 4.0.0
Known to work| |2.95.3
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-28 15:54:00
date| |
Summary|Wrong template function |[3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression]
|specialization chosen |gcc accepts invalid partial
| |specialization attempt of
| |member function
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-28 22:11 ` [Bug c++/20173] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-04-09 10:59 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de @ 2005-04-09 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de 2005-04-09 10:59 -------
is still accepted by 4.0 although 20157 is fixed now
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-09 10:59 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
@ 2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 21:15 ` [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-19 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-22 21:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-22 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 21:13 -------
Moving to 4.0.2 pre Mark.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-22 21:15 ` [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-27 16:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-27 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
[not found] <bug-20173-7611@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-23 17:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 2:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 02:46 -------
Leaving as P2; I've been tinkering with a possible patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function
[not found] <bug-20173-7611@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-23 17:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 2:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-31 2:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-23 20:38 [Bug c++/20173] New: Wrong template function specialization chosen sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:41 ` [Bug c++/20173] " sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:43 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-23 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-28 22:11 ` [Bug c++/20173] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] gcc accepts invalid partial specialization attempt of member function bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-04-09 10:59 ` sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 21:15 ` [Bug c++/20173] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-20173-7611@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-23 17:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 2:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).