public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function
@ 2005-09-29 20:23 doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:24 ` [Bug middle-end/24129] " doko at debian dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: doko at debian dot org @ 2005-09-29 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
$ gcc -O3 -c -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing marshal.i
../Python/marshal.c: In function 'PyMarshal_ReadShortFromFile':
../Python/marshal.c:342: warning: 'rf.end' is used uninitialized in this function
../Python/marshal.c:342: warning: 'rf.ptr' is used uninitialized in this function
The warning is not shown with 3.4 CVS, seen with 4.0.2 and CVS HEAD 20050922,
using -fno-inline-functions avoids the warning.
--
Summary: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used
uninitialized in this function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at debian dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24129
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/24129] [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function
2005-09-29 20:23 [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function doko at debian dot org
@ 2005-09-29 20:24 ` doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: doko at debian dot org @ 2005-09-29 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-09-29 20:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=9841)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9841&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24129
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/24129] [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function
2005-09-29 20:23 [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:24 ` [Bug middle-end/24129] " doko at debian dot org
@ 2005-09-29 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-29 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 20:26 -------
I really doubt this is bogus but I have not looked into the source yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24129
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/24129] [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function
2005-09-29 20:23 [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:24 ` [Bug middle-end/24129] " doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-29 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 20:40 ` doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-29 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 20:35 -------
Lets look at the two functions:
static int
r_short(RFILE *p)
{
register short x;
x = ((p)->fp ? _IO_getc ((p)->fp) : (((p)->ptr != (p)->end) ? (unsigned char)*(p)->ptr++ : (-1)));
x |= ((p)->fp ? _IO_getc ((p)->fp) : (((p)->ptr != (p)->end) ? (unsigned char)*(p)->ptr++ : (-1))) << 8;
x |= -(x & 0x8000);
return x;
}
int
PyMarshal_ReadShortFromFile(FILE *fp)
{
WFILE rf;
rf.fp = fp;
rf.strings = ((void *)0);
return r_short(&rf);
}
It is obvious that the warnings are valid as rf.end and rf.ptr is not initialized in
PyMarshal_ReadShortFromFile. There are no way to know that the arguments passing to
PyMarshal_ReadShortFromFile are non null from the source you gave so the warning is correct.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24129
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/24129] [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function
2005-09-29 20:23 [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function doko at debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-29 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-29 20:40 ` doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: doko at debian dot org @ 2005-09-29 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-09-29 20:40 -------
The line number points to the inlined function, not to
'PyMarshal_ReadShortFromFile'. Is this intended?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24129
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/24129] [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function
2005-09-29 20:23 [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function doko at debian dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-29 20:40 ` doko at debian dot org
@ 2005-09-29 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-29 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 20:44 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> The line number points to the inlined function, not to
> 'PyMarshal_ReadShortFromFile'. Is this intended?
In a way yes but that would be PR 17506 which I have not submitted the patch yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24129
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-29 20:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-29 20:23 [Bug middle-end/24129] New: [4.0 4.1 regression] bogus warning <var> is used uninitialized in this function doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:24 ` [Bug middle-end/24129] " doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 20:40 ` doko at debian dot org
2005-09-29 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).