From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23792 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2005 13:39:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23616 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2005 13:38:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050930133853.23615.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050515175041.21588.steven@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050515175041.21588.steven@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/21588] x86 machine builtins do not have any const/pure attributes set X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg03778.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-09-30 13:38 ------- Subject: Re: x86 machine builtins do not have any const/pure attributes set > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 12:56 ------- > (In reply to comment #5) > > Does the code quality regression still hold even after libcalls was > > removed? These definitly was one of reason for ineffencities in > > pure/const function call code generation. > > I doubt it since these expanded into RTL instruction and there is no call at the rtl level. Hmm, right ;) Should look deper into PR before responding... Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21588