From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18157 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2005 14:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18120 invoked by uid 48); 30 Sep 2005 14:17:24 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050930141724.18119.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050930134250.24146.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050930134250.24146.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/24146] [4.0 Regression] Optimizes away FPU control word store X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg03796.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 14:17 ------- Hmm, the comment in c-typeck.c: /* Build an asm-expr, whose components are a STRING, some OUTPUTS, some INPUTS, and some CLOBBERS. The latter three may be NULL. SIMPLE indicates whether there was anything at all after the string in the asm expression -- asm("blah") and asm("blah" : ) are subtly different. We use a ASM_EXPR node to represent this. */ so maybe this is invalid after all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24146