From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19047 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2005 14:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18869 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2005 14:18:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050930141817.18868.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050930134250.24146.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050930134250.24146.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/24146] [4.0 Regression] Optimizes away FPU control word store X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg03798.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 14:18 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Optimizes away FPU control word store On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:07 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 14:07 ------- > I still say this is invalid. > well, that just makes you wrong. the docs clearly say it's supposed to be treated as volatile. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24146