From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10778 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2005 15:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10748 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2005 15:45:55 -0000 Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051001154555.10747.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050921173132.24003.laurent@guerby.net> References: <20050921173132.24003.laurent@guerby.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/24003] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL 17 regressions on x86-linux, fixed and decimal arithmetic broken X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 15:45 ------- Well, if the exception is never raised, the difference in EH code generation is probably not an issue. Reverting the patch is definitly possible (there is nothing dependent on it and except for one or two PRs exposing problems in libcall mechanizm it only results in better code. However this is almost definitly previously latent bug (we just disable RTL level optimizatoin), I would like to have some understanding to what is going wrong. Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003