public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051001185032.10107.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050926232200.24071.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 18:50 -------
Hey dudes.
Mark, the original problem report, the fails, is fixed on mainline and on the
gcc-4_0-branch. It looks like the fix for this, after all our effort, did not
make it into 4.0.2. Whoops: mistakes happen. I didn't consider this stop-ship
then and certainly don't now, and think that the notes Eric made (use -pthreads
if using __mt_allocator) are an acceptable workaround.
However, there is a bigger issue involved, which is still in progress. Actually,
I'd like to broaden this out a bit since it looks like we are thinking of
solving a related issue on linux as well. (See RH bugzilla, link below)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165728
Therefore, I'm suggesting I close this, and open a more general enhancement bug.
That might clarify the situation for everybody.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24071
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-01 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-26 23:22 [Bug libstdc++/24071] New: " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-26 23:22 ` [Bug libstdc++/24071] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-26 23:24 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 0:18 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 7:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 8:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 9:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 9:17 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 18:46 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 18:50 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-10-01 19:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-24071-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-02 21:21 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-02 21:28 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051001185032.10107.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).