From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16666 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2005 23:05:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16644 invoked by uid 48); 4 Oct 2005 23:05:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051004230503.16643.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 23:05 ------- Hmm, I think this is related to PR 15167. This worked with "4.0.0 20050225" and "3.5.0 20040909". Though it failed with "3.4.0 20040116" and 3.4.0 release and the current mainline. I am going to mark this currently as a 4.1 regression but not confirm it until I can get a newer 4.0.x and 3.4.x though I will fill out the known to work/fail for releases I tried. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Known to fail| |3.4.0 4.1.0 Known to work| |3.3.3 Summary|Segfault with #pragma once |[4.1 Regression] Segfault | |with #pragma once Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202