From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13637 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2005 23:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13614 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2005 23:38:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051006233809.13613.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/24243] [4.0 regression] lookup fails to match to function call, const-sensitive In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fang at csl dot cornell dot edu" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #7 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-10-06 23:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=9913) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9913&action=view) corrected header file Just as a follow-up, here's what the new valid header file looks like, with all the various mem_fun definitions corrected in the const cases. (Perhaps this might be useful for reference in future test cases?) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24243