From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8507 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2005 07:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8474 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2005 07:30:27 -0000 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051007073027.8473.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug driver/19848] "options passed" from -verbose-asm do not adequately reflect optimization In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00859.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 07:30 ------- Thomas, perhaps we could divide and conquer. We could manually eliminate each of the 204 optimzations one at a time until the breakage disappears. Maybe we develop a script to locate those, bubblestrap, test, remove, and go on to the next until its discovered. I know its a pain, but it could be done. If not a script, then get several volunteers and assign them out to check. It would be nice to claim a final victory on this. Any thoughts anyone -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19848