public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/21089] [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011170031.10686.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-21089-183@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #20 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-11 17:00 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline"
the static const double
sabre at nondot dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #19 from sabre at nondot dot org 2005-10-11 16:58 -------
> To clarify: you are saying that the response in comment #12 is wrong?
I don't understand Comment #12. However, Comment #13 says that "You are
correct Chris, this was an invalid optimization"; that's incorrect, it
is in fact a required optimization.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21089
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-11 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-21089-183@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-11 7:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-11 16:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-11 16:58 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2005-10-11 17:00 ` mark at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2005-10-11 17:03 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2005-10-11 17:05 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-11 17:10 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2005-10-11 17:15 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2005-10-11 20:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-11 20:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-11 21:05 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-31 17:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-31 17:41 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 17:26 [Bug c++/21089] New: c++ accepts invalid static const double members with initializer matz at suse dot de
2005-04-18 17:53 ` [Bug c++/21089] [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 17:59 ` matz at suse dot de
2005-04-18 18:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 18:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 18:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 18:41 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2005-04-18 19:36 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-04-21 5:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-28 2:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-28 2:46 ` matz at suse dot de
2005-04-28 8:03 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-28 9:24 ` matz at suse dot de
2005-05-02 14:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-08 1:42 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-20 14:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051011170031.10686.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).