public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] [4.0/4.1 Regresson] about 2x perfomance regression in comparision with 3.4.2
       [not found] <bug-20945-7607@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-17  9:27 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-17  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-17 09:27 -------
Comments #4 and #5 suggest that there is still some slowdown compared to
gcc 3.4 and earlier, but we know what the problems are and we have open
bug reports for those problems.

Since this bug is now inactive for many months, and there really is not
much information in this bug that isn't reported elsewhere, I'm going to
close this one.  After looking at the code differences between 3.4 and 4.1,
I suspect PR18048 is the main source of trouble for the remaining slowdown
so I'm closing this one as a dup of PR18048.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18048 ***


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] [4.0/4.1 Regresson] about 2x perfomance regression in comparision with 3.4.2
  2005-04-11 13:17 [Bug fortran/20945] New: " denis dot nagorny at intel dot com
  2005-07-10 19:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] [4.0/4.1 Regresson] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-29  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-29  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|i586-suse-linux             |i586-*-*-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] [4.0/4.1 Regresson] about 2x perfomance regression in comparision with 3.4.2
  2005-04-11 13:17 [Bug fortran/20945] New: " denis dot nagorny at intel dot com
@ 2005-07-10 19:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-29  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-10 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |18427
            Summary|about 2x perfomance         |[4.0/4.1 Regresson] about 2x
                   |regression in comparision   |perfomance regression in
                   |with 3.4.2                  |comparision with 3.4.2
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-17  9:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-20945-7607@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-17  9:27 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] [4.0/4.1 Regresson] about 2x perfomance regression in comparision with 3.4.2 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-11 13:17 [Bug fortran/20945] New: " denis dot nagorny at intel dot com
2005-07-10 19:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/20945] [4.0/4.1 Regresson] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).