public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/24406] EQUIVALENCE broken in 32-bit code with optimization -O2 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:01:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051017180058.13767.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-24406-10567@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 18:00 ------- The code is illegal, and therefore gfortran can do anything it wants (including start WW III). (1) rteps is never defined, so it can't be reference in the IF statement. (2) Even if rteps was defined prior to the assignments of irt(1) and irt(2), rteps would become undefined via 14.7.6(1) of the standard. (3) The use of BOZ literal constants here is nonstandard although gfortran may permit its use in this manner (I haven't checked). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24406
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 18:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-10-17 11:10 [Bug fortran/24406] New: " mick at nag dot co dot uk 2005-10-17 11:29 ` [Bug fortran/24406] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 11:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 18:01 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 18:01 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2005-10-23 22:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 20:20 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 20:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 20:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24406] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 20:57 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-02-06 21:01 ` [Bug fortran/24406] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 10:08 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-03-06 21:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 7:28 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-03-23 1:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-23 8:06 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-03-23 14:54 ` Andrew Pinski 2006-03-23 14:54 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-04-23 6:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 10:13 ` mick at nag dot co dot uk
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20051017180058.13767.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).