From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24667 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2005 21:43:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24644 invoked by uid 48); 18 Oct 2005 21:43:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051018214305.24642.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/24432] [4.1 regression] Missing symbols In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gmail dot com" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg02512.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gmail dot com 2005-10-18 21:43 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > has introduced a bunch of regressions on non-C99 SPARC/Solaris platforms How come they I don't see those on my sparc-solaris2.9 builds? See http://quatramaran.ens.fr/~coudert/gfortran/test-results/test-sparc-solaris-20051012.log and older. This is particularly annoying, since sparc-solaris2.9 is one of the platforms on which I regtested this patch! Other than that, I concur in diagnosis and solution. Will implement that as soon as possible (most probably on Wednesday evening, European time). > [FX, please make sure your email address as recorded in the ChangeLog file is > registered with Bugzilla; same for fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org. Thanks in advance.] Sorry, I didn't know that rule. Will use my gcc.gnu.org address in changelogs in the future. Does that need to be retroactive? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24432