From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7692 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 11:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7622 invoked by uid 48); 21 Oct 2005 11:13:26 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051021111326.7621.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/24257] [4.1 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn with -O -fgcse -fgcse-sm In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg02771.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 11:13 ------- I do not consider this to be a regression, really. Store motion was always broken. There are reasons for why it is disabled by default ;-) pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24257