From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6887 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 12:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6681 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 12:48:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051021124834.6680.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/24257] [4.1 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn with -O -fgcse -fgcse-sm In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg02785.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 12:48 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn with -O -fgcse -fgcse-sm On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:13 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not? I think it should be kept as a regression. Otherwise it will get overlooked before it is time to turn on store motion. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24257