From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17220 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2005 06:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17179 invoked by uid 48); 23 Oct 2005 06:47:44 -0000 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051023064744.17178.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/19165] (Natural) language independent error / warning classification In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg02979.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 06:47 ------- There's an Eclipse PR for this, fwiw: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=108720 If you look there you can see further motivation -- in particular, the continuation messages that gcc sometimes prints are basically confusing to an IDE. Parsing the translated message seems like a very difficult approach. Consider messages that have printf substitutions in them for instance. Or in the case in the above PR, there is nothing distinguishing about some of the continuation messages. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165