public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
       [not found] <bug-16465-270@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-23 21:24 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-05-31  5:16 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |minor


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
       [not found] <bug-16465-270@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-23 21:24 ` [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-31  5:16 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-05-31  5:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
  2006-05-31  6:00 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-31  5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-31 05:16 -------
I think we ought to scrap this.  There is no real point to it,is there?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
       [not found] <bug-16465-270@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-23 21:24 ` [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-05-31  5:16 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-31  5:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
  2006-05-31  6:00 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au @ 2006-05-31  5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au  2006-05-31 05:36 -------
Subject: RE:  parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7

> ------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  
> 2006-05-31 05:16 -------
> I think we ought to scrap this.  There is no real point to 
> it,is there?
> 

Yes, this is OK with me.  I was just noting difference with g77.
We don't want to support all the wierd "functionality".

        David


NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are private and confidential and may contain
privileged information. If you are not an authorised recipient, the copying or
distribution of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited and you must not
read, print or act in reliance on this e-mail or attachments.
This notice should not be removed.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
       [not found] <bug-16465-270@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-05-31  5:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
@ 2006-05-31  6:00 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-31  6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-31 05:59 -------
Closing.


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
  2004-07-10 12:52 [Bug fortran/16465] New: gfortran does not accept -ffixed-line-length-72.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-09-01 14:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 14:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |19292
              nThis|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
  2004-07-10 12:52 [Bug fortran/16465] New: gfortran does not accept -ffixed-line-length-72.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-07-18 13:09 ` [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-07-22 17:59 ` tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2004-09-01 14:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-06 14:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-01 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-01 14:39 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6) 
> > ffixed-line-length-7.f doesn't yet work, this is apparently an issue in the 
> > parser. The testaces looks like this: 
> >        E 
> >       1N 
> >       2D 
>  
> Note that in any case, the standard specifically prohibits breaking a program 
> unit END statement over a number of lines in fixed form (See, eg F95 3.3.2.4).  
> However, g77 does allow it.

Just saw this comment, I had forgotten to add myself to the CC list. We have
this problem with all statements, not just END. At the same time we allow
something like
     END
    1PROGRAM



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
  2004-07-10 12:52 [Bug fortran/16465] New: gfortran does not accept -ffixed-line-length-72.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-07-18 13:09 ` [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-22 17:59 ` tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2004-09-01 14:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-06 14:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2004-07-22 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk  2004-07-22 17:59 -------
(In reply to comment #6) 
> ffixed-line-length-7.f doesn't yet work, this is apparently an issue in the 
> parser. The testaces looks like this: 
>        E 
>       1N 
>       2D 
 
Note that in any case, the standard specifically prohibits breaking a program 
unit END statement over a number of lines in fixed form (See, eg F95 3.3.2.4).  
However, g77 does allow it.  
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7
  2004-07-10 12:52 [Bug fortran/16465] New: gfortran does not accept -ffixed-line-length-72.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-18 13:09 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-07-22 17:59 ` tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-18 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-07-18 13:09 -------
ffixed-line-length-7.f doesn't yet work, this is apparently an issue in the
parser. The testaces looks like this:
       E
      1N
      2D

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|documentation, patch        |rejects-valid
            Summary|gfortran does not accept -  |parser chokes with ffixed-
                   |ffixed-line-length-72       |line-length-7


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16465


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-31  6:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-16465-270@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-23 21:24 ` [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-31  5:16 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-31  5:36 ` david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au
2006-05-31  6:00 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-10 12:52 [Bug fortran/16465] New: gfortran does not accept -ffixed-line-length-72.f billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-18 13:09 ` [Bug fortran/16465] parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 17:59 ` tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk
2004-09-01 14:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 14:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).