public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
[not found] <bug-18911-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-23 19:27 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 19:47 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 19:27 -------
I still see it with LAST_UPDATED "Mon Oct 17 15:28:21 UTC 2005".
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2005-07-27 20:24:00 |2005-10-23 19:27:08
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
[not found] <bug-18911-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-23 19:27 ` [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-23 19:47 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 19:47 -------
For the MMIX simulator on a 3.0 GHz P4, "time" shows:
mmix array16.exex 323.47s user 0.01s system 100% cpu 5:23.36 total
So, it *just* above the default time-out at 5min.
Comparing to a *slightly faster* simulator, the CGEN-generated one for
cris-elf, it's:
../../sim/cris/run array16.exex 14.44s user 0.01s system 99% cpu 14.459 total
So, it depends on the port and simulator whether the test can be reasonably
run.
(I've observed the array16 test to fail on my amd64 system exactly when
cpuspeed
is "stuck" at 1GHz rather than 2GHz due to some kernel bug.)
I'll adjust the test to compile-only for nonnative targets.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-10-23 19:27:08 |2005-10-23 19:47:41
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
[not found] <bug-18911-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-23 19:27 ` [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 19:47 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 21:44 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 21:38 -------
Subject: Bug 18911
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: hp@gcc.gnu.org 2005-10-23 21:37:57
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init: array16.C
Log message:
PR target/18911
* g++.dg/init/array16.C: Skip for mmix-*-*.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6237&r2=1.6238
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array16.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
[not found] <bug-18911-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-23 21:44 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 21:44 -------
Non-empty comment to appease bugzilla as I close this PR.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
[not found] <bug-18911-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-23 21:44 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-23 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-23 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
@ 2004-12-09 21:09 hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:11 ` [Bug target/18911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-09 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
With LAST_UPDATED: "Thu Dec 9 10:50:49 UTC 2004" I get:
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution test
No particular hint in g++.log.
The host machine is a Celeron 2.6GHz.
This is a new test, introduced between "Thu Dec 9 03:56:14 UTC 2004"
and above. Looking at the test, it seems it is simply a bit too long
execution-wise and at least not fit for simulator targets.
Does it really need e.g. in the order of 4e6 iterations to accomplish
its goal? Or can that number be divided by say 10000;
s/elt buffer[4111222]/elt buffer[411]/ ?
--
Summary: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure:
g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,nathan at gcc dot gnu
dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-23 22:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-18911-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-23 19:27 ` [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 19:47 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 21:44 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 22:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:09 [Bug target/18911] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:11 ` [Bug target/18911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:17 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:04 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-27 20:34 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).