* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-25 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-25 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (41 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-25 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 23:45 -------
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-25 23:45 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-25 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-25 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (40 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-25 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 23:45 -------
To close as invalid.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-25 23:45 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-25 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-25 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 0:24 ` echristo at apple dot com
` (39 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-25 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 23:46 -------
*** Bug 24531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |echristo at apple dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-25 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 0:24 ` echristo at apple dot com
2005-10-26 0:25 ` echristo at apple dot com
` (38 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: echristo at apple dot com @ 2005-10-26 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from echristo at apple dot com 2005-10-26 00:24 -------
reopening
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:24 ` echristo at apple dot com
@ 2005-10-26 0:25 ` echristo at apple dot com
2005-10-26 0:26 ` echristo at apple dot com
` (37 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: echristo at apple dot com @ 2005-10-26 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |echristo at apple dot com
|dot org |
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-10-26 00:25:10
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:25 ` echristo at apple dot com
@ 2005-10-26 0:26 ` echristo at apple dot com
2005-10-26 0:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (36 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: echristo at apple dot com @ 2005-10-26 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from echristo at apple dot com 2005-10-26 00:26 -------
int main (int argc, char * const argv[]) {
// |_____________| |______________\
if (1)
{
printf("Hello");
}
else
{
printf("There");
}
return 0;
}
Note that there's a space after the comment above.
To clarify this a bit more:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00819.html
Is Howard Hinnant's comment on the subject and the thread that started this.
There's a space at the end of the line that the has the comment.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:26 ` echristo at apple dot com
@ 2005-10-26 0:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 0:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (35 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 00:43 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00603.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 0:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 0:46 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (34 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 00:45 -------
Hmm, looks like the diagnost issue is a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (33 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 00:46 -------
The diagnostic issue is a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic
Summary|back-slash newline extension|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression]
|can't be removed |back-slash newline extension
| |can't be removed
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:46 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 0:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (32 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 00:46 -------
Cause by the patch referenced in comment #11.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 0:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (31 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 00:58 -------
One more previous discussion, this time started from someone at Apple:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-11/msg00267.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 0:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (30 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:02 -------
More discusssions:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-08/msg01118.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (29 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:05 -------
Some more:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00543.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (28 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:10 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-03/msg00130.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-10/msg00012.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg01181.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:17 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-05/msg01032.html
Knowing the history around these are important. and if you don't believe that
well then getting this right is not going to happen.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:31 -------
Maybe the last one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2000-10/msg00117.html
There are most likely more. All found using google, maybe people should be
doing that sometimes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (25 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:33 -------
Oh, the last discussion of this problem was in PR 15519
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:37 -------
Another one from earlier this year:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01685.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:39 -------
>From 2003:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-11/msg00105.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 1:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:42 -------
*** Bug 3786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |loewis at informatik dot hu-
| |berlin dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 1:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 01:59 -------
*** Bug 5735 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jbeulich at novell dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 1:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 2:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #26 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 02:00 -------
Note changing this behavior will most likely get PR 263 wrong.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |263
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 2:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 6:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #27 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 02:12 -------
One more note, we do get a warning with -W -Wall:
t.c:1:1: warning: multi-line comment
Which is our recommened warning level anyways, yes this is inconstaint but that
was a disussion which was maded in comment #11
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 2:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 6:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #28 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 06:29 -------
You might as well look into PR 24024 which is only semi related but since you
are looking at preprocessor with backslash, it might be easy to fix that one
too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 6:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 21:46 ` echristo at apple dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #29 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 21:41 -------
Hmm, there consense is that at the least we should warn for comments. But the
consense from non Apple people it seems to not to change the behavior.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 21:46 ` echristo at apple dot com
2005-10-26 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: echristo at apple dot com @ 2005-10-26 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #30 from echristo at apple dot com 2005-10-26 21:46 -------
That would be the consensus from Andrew, not from people concerned that deal
with language issues routinely.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 21:46 ` echristo at apple dot com
@ 2005-10-26 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-26 23:07 ` Neil Booth
2005-10-26 23:07 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
` (15 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-26 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #31 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 21:49 -------
(In reply to comment #30)
> That would be the consensus from Andrew, not from people concerned that deal
> with language issues routinely.
Wait a minute, if you actually look at the people agrueing for the change, it
is only Apple employees. Joe has said we should not change it. It looks like
DJ is saying the same in the new thread which shows the real issues with the
other compilers implemenation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
2005-10-26 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 23:07 ` Neil Booth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Neil Booth @ 2005-10-26 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org; +Cc: gcc-bugs
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> > That would be the consensus from Andrew, not from people concerned that deal
> > with language issues routinely.
>
> Wait a minute, if you actually look at the people agrueing for the change, it
> is only Apple employees. Joe has said we should not change it. It looks like
> DJ is saying the same in the new thread which shows the real issues with the
> other compilers implemenation.
I've said we should change it, I don't work for Apple. Please stop
trying to claim your opinion is some kind of consensus.
Neil.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-26 23:07 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
2005-10-26 23:13 ` dj at redhat dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk @ 2005-10-26 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #32 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-10-26 23:07 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be
removed
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> > That would be the consensus from Andrew, not from people concerned that deal
> > with language issues routinely.
>
> Wait a minute, if you actually look at the people agrueing for the change, it
> is only Apple employees. Joe has said we should not change it. It looks like
> DJ is saying the same in the new thread which shows the real issues with the
> other compilers implemenation.
I've said we should change it, I don't work for Apple. Please stop
trying to claim your opinion is some kind of consensus.
Neil.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be removed
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 23:07 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
@ 2005-10-26 23:13 ` dj at redhat dot com
2005-10-30 21:43 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: dj at redhat dot com @ 2005-10-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #33 from dj at redhat dot com 2005-10-26 23:13 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be
removed
> It looks like DJ is saying the same in the new thread which shows
> the real issues with the other compilers implemenation.
I would be in favor of treating \r differently from other whitespace
for the purposes of reporting this error. The cr-lf-newline mess is
different from the trailing space mess.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-26 23:13 ` dj at redhat dot com
@ 2005-10-30 21:43 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 3:20 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #34 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 21:43 -------
This is a usability issue (and, maybe, a pedantic standards-conformance
issue?), but is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-30 21:43 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 3:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-08 21:12 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " echristo at apple dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 3:20 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-08 21:12 ` echristo at apple dot com
2007-01-18 2:37 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: echristo at apple dot com @ 2006-06-08 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #35 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-06-08 21:06 -------
I'm unlikely to work on this...
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|echristo at apple dot com |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-08 21:12 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " echristo at apple dot com
@ 2007-01-18 2:37 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-21 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-18 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #36 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:37 -------
A fix is not going to happen for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-18 2:37 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-21 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-21 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-21 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 16:29 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 16:29 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-07 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #37 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 16:28 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|back-slash white space |back-slash white space
|newline with comments, no |newline with comments, no
|warning |warning
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 16:29 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-07 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-07 1:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-07 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #39 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-07 01:01 -------
>From JSM in PR 38433:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, eric dot niebler at gmail dot com wrote:
> In the attached file, there is a comment terminated with a line-termination
> character (\) followed by spaces. This should NOT be considered a line
> terminator, yet gcc considers it as such. From 2.1/2 in the C++03 standard:
>
> "Each instance of a new-line character and an immediately preceding backslash
> character is deleted, splicing physical source lines to form logical source
> lines."
This (removal of such spaces) is part of how GCC defines the
implementation-defined mapping in translation phase 1. There are no input
files that GCC interprets as representing a program that enters phase 2
with backslash-space at the end of a line.
> That is, only backslashes immediately followed by a newline are considered line
> terminators. The existing behavior of gcc violates the standard and conflicts
> with the behavior of other popular C++ compilers (EDG, MSVC).
No, it conforms to the standard but does not allow certain programs to be
represented. (I think this is a bad idea, but that's another matter.)
--- CUT ---
Which explains why this is conforming to the standard and is allowed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-07 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-07 1:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 16:12 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-07 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #38 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-07 00:58 -------
*** Bug 38433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eric dot niebler at gmail
| |dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-07 1:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 16:12 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #40 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 16:12 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|back-slash white space |back-slash white space
|newline with comments, no |newline with comments, no
|warning |warning
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (38 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 16:12 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-17 17:42 ` jessiecute13 at aol dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:25 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (39 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-17 17:42 ` jessiecute13 at aol dot com
2010-05-22 18:11 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: jessiecute13 at aol dot com @ 2009-08-17 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #42 from jessiecute13 at aol dot com 2009-08-17 17:42 -------
HOw much costs will be :$ 11.48
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (40 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-17 17:42 ` jessiecute13 at aol dot com
@ 2010-05-22 18:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:09 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread* [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
[not found] <bug-8270-4718@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (41 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-22 18:11 ` [Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
42 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-01 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #43 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-01 18:24 -------
*** Bug 44355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |romain dot failliot at gmail
| |dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread