public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/19923] [4.0/4.1 Regression] openssl is slower when compiled with gcc 4.0 than 3.3
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051027004704.13955.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-19923-6145@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #31 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 00:47 -------
(In reply to comment #30)
> This patch could help; I need to benchmark it before submitting it.
Any news about this patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19923
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-27 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-19923-6145@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-27 0:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-10-31 2:39 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-16 9:42 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-17 13:35 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-17 15:09 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-24 0:26 ` [Bug target/19923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-27 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:05 ` [Bug target/19923] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-04 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-19 10:04 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-19 12:28 ` dank at kegel dot com
2007-11-28 17:19 ` dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 18:01 ` dank at kegel dot com
2008-01-25 21:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-26 14:09 ` [Bug target/19923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-12 20:07 [Bug c/19923] New: " gj at pointblue dot com dot pl
2005-06-08 13:15 ` [Bug target/19923] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-06-17 0:59 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-17 1:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-18 6:24 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-18 6:39 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-18 17:47 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-18 22:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-24 15:00 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-24 15:01 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-06-24 15:53 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-24 16:24 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2005-06-24 17:41 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-06-25 2:49 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-25 10:15 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-25 11:32 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2005-09-27 15:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051027004704.13955.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).