From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15779 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2005 09:07:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15761 invoked by uid 48); 27 Oct 2005 09:07:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051027090749.15760.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/24537] Non-uglified names inside namespace __gnu_cxx In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg03515.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-27 09:07 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Naming wise I think __gnu_ext makes more sense. It's what we should have used > for the extension namespace from the beginning. Of course I'm ok with __gnu_ext. Actually, I'm ok with anything you would rather prefer, __gnu_legacy was just an example, meant to make totally clear (for argumentation purposes too) that we are talking about legacy stuff, indeed. Anyway, when I will actually prepare a patch, it will move the old HP/SGI facilities to namespace __gnu_ext, agreed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24537