* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
@ 2005-10-27 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-27 11:26 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-27 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 11:18 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17737 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
2005-10-27 11:18 ` [Bug fortran/24554] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-27 11:26 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-27 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-27 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 11:26 -------
Huh, how can this ICE be a duplicate of an accepts-invalid bug??
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
2005-10-27 11:18 ` [Bug fortran/24554] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-27 11:26 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-27 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-28 6:09 ` mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-27 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 12:33 -------
Because if you look in that BUGs audit-trail we have
The error message is
city3s.f:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at
fortran/data.c:319
given the detailled information in this (24554) bugreport, I conclude
this is a dup of 17737. qed. My sixth sense says, this one here is
ice-on-invalid, too ;)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-27 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-28 6:09 ` mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
2005-10-28 11:18 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org @ 2005-10-28 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org 2005-10-28 06:09 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Because if you look in that BUGs audit-trail we have
>
> The error message is
>
> city3s.f:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at
> fortran/data.c:319
>
> given the detailled information in this (24554) bugreport, I conclude
> this is a dup of 17737. qed. My sixth sense says, this one here is
> ice-on-invalid, too ;)
I don't understand what is the exact solution to my problem. ??? What I have to
do to? :(
--
mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-28 6:09 ` mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
@ 2005-10-28 11:18 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-28 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-28 11:18 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I don't understand what is the exact solution to my problem.
Nobody has said there is a solution at the moment. When Richard Guenther
marked this PR as RESOLVED, DUPLICATE, it didn't mean that the bug was solved,
only that he thought it looked the same as another PR.
>??? What I have to do to? :(
Send us the code that triggers that "internal compiler error"-message. Without
the code there is not much else we can do than try to guess what the problem
might be (like assuming it's the same as in some other PR). A testcase reduced
to as few code lines as possible is prefered, but even the full code is better
than nothing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-28 11:18 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-22 1:07 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-23 16:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 17:55 -------
Can you attach the source?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-30 17:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-22 1:07 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-23 16:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-22 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-22 01:06 -------
Closing as fixed. The (duplicate?) PR pointed to by Richard has
been fixed, and the originator of this bug report has not supplied
the code as requested by Andrew on 10/30/05.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error
2005-10-27 7:04 [Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-22 1:07 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-23 16:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-23 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread