[Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error

[Bug fortran/24554] New: internal compiler error

[mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org]

C:\Fortran>gfortran TOBAM5.f
TOBAM5.f:527: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at
fortran/data
.c:319
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


-- 
           Summary: internal compiler error
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-27 11:18 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17737 ***


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-27 11:26 -------
Huh, how can this ICE be a duplicate of an accepts-invalid bug??


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-27 12:33 -------
Because if you look in that BUGs audit-trail we have

The error message is 

city3s.f:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at 
fortran/data.c:319 

given the detailled information in this (24554) bugreport, I conclude
this is a dup of 17737.  qed.  My sixth sense says, this one here is
ice-on-invalid, too ;)


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-invalid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org]

------- Comment #4 from mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org  2005-10-28 06:09 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Because if you look in that BUGs audit-trail we have
> 
> The error message is 
> 
> city3s.f:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at 
> fortran/data.c:319 
> 
> given the detailled information in this (24554) bugreport, I conclude
> this is a dup of 17737.  qed.  My sixth sense says, this one here is
> ice-on-invalid, too ;)

I don't understand what is the exact solution to my problem. ??? What I have to
do to? :(


-- 

mabdallah at unido-ichet dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-28 11:18 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I don't understand what is the exact solution to my problem. 

Nobody has said there is a solution at the moment.  When Richard Guenther
marked this PR as RESOLVED, DUPLICATE, it didn't mean that the bug was solved,
only that he thought it looked the same as another PR.

>??? What I have to do to? :(

Send us the code that triggers that "internal compiler error"-message. Without
the code there is not much else we can do than try to guess what the problem
might be (like assuming it's the same as in some other PR).  A testcase reduced
to as few code lines as possible is prefered, but even the full code is better
than nothing.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-30 17:55 -------
Can you attach the source?


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-22 01:06 -------
Closing as fixed.  The (duplicate?) PR pointed to by Richard has
been fixed, and the originator of this bug report has not supplied
the code as requested by Andrew on 10/30/05.


-- 

kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554

[Bug fortran/24554] internal compiler error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554