public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/15184] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Direct access to byte inside word not working with -march=pentiumpro
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051030222605.30735.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-15184-1037@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-30 22:26 -------
Downgraded to P5.

I don't think this missed-optimization on the Pentium Pro (now a relatively old
CPU) is release-critical, especially since we think that the change that caused
the problem was generally beneficial.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-30 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-15184-1037@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-14 17:44 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-03-11  3:20 ` [Bug target/15184] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-08  8:42 ` [Bug target/15184] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " bonzini at gnu dot org
2007-01-18  2:55 ` [Bug target/15184] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-21 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14  9:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-01 19:52 ` rask at sygehus dot dk
2008-07-04 16:32 ` [Bug target/15184] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 16:18 ` [Bug target/15184] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:13 ` [Bug target/15184] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 23:52 [Bug optimization/15184] New: " cesarb at nitnet dot com dot br
2005-05-19 17:30 ` [Bug target/15184] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051030222605.30735.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).