* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-16 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-16 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 22:17 -------
This is so minor issue and does not come from any real code and I just made
this example when looking at code gen in general so moving to 4.2.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Summary|[4.0/4.1 Regression] Missed |[4.0/4.1 Regression] Missed
|optimization with bitfields |optimization with bitfields
| |with return value
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-16 22:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-16 22:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28 20:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:44 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-28 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-25 2:44 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-25 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:35 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-25 2:44 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 22:33 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-05 22:33 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 16:32 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-05 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-05 23:33 -------
FWIW, the patch for PR 22156 does not change the generated code on ppc,
although it appears to improve the x86 code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-05 22:33 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 16:32 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 16:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 16:32 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|Missed optimization with |Missed optimization with
|bitfields with return value |bitfields with return value
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 16:32 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 16:19 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 16:19 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|Missed optimization with |Missed optimization with
|bitfields with return value |bitfields with return value
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 16:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-05 12:07 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-05 12:07 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-06 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-05 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 12:07 -------
Looks fixed on ARM. Pinski, what say you on ppc?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-05 12:07 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-06 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
[not found] <bug-15596-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-22 18:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-06 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-06 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-06 23:12 -------
Martin, perhaps a test case you want to watch if you or someone else is going
to play with SRA vs. bitfields.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread