public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20643] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Tree loop optimizer does worse job than RTL loop optimizer Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:51:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051031025125.15613.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-20643-3107@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 02:51 ------- Dan, is there any chance of fixing this for 4.1? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20643
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-31 2:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-20643-3107@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-10-03 15:10 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-10-31 2:51 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2005-10-31 3:43 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 0:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:15 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-28 14:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 2:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 13:21 ` anemo at mba dot ocn dot ne dot jp 2006-07-16 13:53 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 11:55 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 13:34 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2006-07-18 16:53 ` anemo at mba dot ocn dot ne dot jp 2006-07-18 17:04 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2007-02-14 9:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20643] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-11 0:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 17:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 16:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20643] [4.2 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 15:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-25 22:21 [Bug tree-optimization/20643] New: " sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-06-15 3:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20643] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20051031025125.15613.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).