From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21881 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2005 03:11:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18281 invoked by uid 48); 31 Oct 2005 03:11:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051031031135.18280.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/21308] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Very high compile time In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg04001.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 03:11 ------- I had another round of thoughts about this bug. It's clear that we need better data structures to get this right. It's not clear that I know what they should be. In any case, yes, we should try to ameliorate this problem; leaving as P2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21308