public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-13 19:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 3:55 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-13 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:55 -------
Any news on getting this partial patch committed, as this will at least bring
us back to pre 4.0 times.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 19:55 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 3:55 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-16 19:05 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 03:55 -------
Gaby, please apply the simple OBJ_TYPE_REF patch so that we can remove the
regression markers from this PR.
(I agree that a complete solution is difficult; my opinion continues to be that
we should use carets, rather than trying to print out expressions.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 19:55 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 3:55 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-16 19:05 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-11-22 17:04 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-11-16 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-11-16 19:05 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Gaby, please apply the simple OBJ_TYPE_REF patch so that we can remove the
| regression markers from this PR.
OK.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-16 19:05 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2005-11-22 17:04 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 18:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 17:04 -------
Subject: Bug 22238
Author: gdr
Date: Tue Nov 22 17:04:12 2005
New Revision: 107366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107366
Log:
PR c++/22238
* error.c (resolve_virtual_fun_from_obj_type_ref): New.
(dump_expr): Use it in <case CALL_EXPR>.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/error.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-22 17:04 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 18:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 22:28 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 18:08 -------
Subject: Bug 22238
Author: gdr
Date: Tue Nov 22 18:08:17 2005
New Revision: 107367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107367
Log:
PR c++/22238
* error.c (resolve_virtual_fun_from_obj_type_ref): New.
(dump_expr): Use it in <case CALL_EXPR>.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/error.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-22 18:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 22:28 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 23:20 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 22:27 -------
Subject: Bug 22238
Author: gdr
Date: Tue Nov 22 22:27:52 2005
New Revision: 107376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107376
Log:
PR c++/22238
* error.c (resolve_virtual_fun_from_obj_type_ref): New.
(dump_expr): Use it in <case CALL_EXPR>.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/error.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-22 22:28 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 23:20 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-17 23:40 ` [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 23:20 -------
No longer a regression.
Set bug back at "normal" state -- no milestone.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] |[4.0/4.1/4.2]
|'#'obj_type_ref' not |'#'obj_type_ref' not
|supported by dump_expr |supported by dump_expr
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-22 23:20 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-17 23:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-17 23:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-17 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 23:40 -------
Andrew, Gaby's testcase from comment #4 gets an even worse diagnostic
since the merge of the ptr_plus stuff:
=========================================
struct A
{
void foo();
};
struct B : virtual A
{
void bar() { if (foo()) ; }
};
=========================================
bug.cc: In member function 'void B::bar()':
bug.cc:8: error: could not convert '#'pointer_plus_expr' not supported by
dump_expr#<expression error>->A::foo()' to 'bool'
Would you mind having a look?
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-17 23:40 ` [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-17 23:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-21 19:56 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-21 20:27 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-17 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 23:42 -------
>Would you mind having a look?
I was going to fix the pretty printing of pointer_plus_expr for C++ after I
returned from Japan. I already have a testcase which is better than the one
here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-17 23:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-21 19:56 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-21 20:27 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-21 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-21 19:56 -------
The pointer_plus_exprt stuff has been fixed.
We are now back to error messages like
bug.cc: In member function 'void B::bar()':
bug.cc:4: error: could not convert '(((A*)this) + ((unsigned int)(*(int*)(
((B*)this)->B::_vptr.B + 0xfffffffffffffff4u))))->A::foo()' to 'bool'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-21 19:56 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-21 20:27 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu @ 2007-08-21 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-08-21 20:27 -------
Subject: Re: Awful error messages with virtual functions
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| The pointer_plus_exprt stuff has been fixed.
|
| We are now back to error messages like
|
| bug.cc: In member function 'void B::bar()':
| bug.cc:4: error: could not convert '(((A*)this) + ((unsigned int)(*(int*)(
| ((B*)this)->B::_vptr.B + 0xfffffffffffffff4u))))->A::foo()' to 'bool'
Until we have a separate higher level representation in the C++
front-end, this is going to be hard to fix correctly. The alternative
is that we don't print expressions at all -- but that cure seems to me
to be worse than the disease.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-03 14:11 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-27 16:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-30 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-03 14:11 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-03 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 14:10 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
>
> "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
> | ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30
02:00 -------
> | Confirmed, caused by the patch which introduced obj_type_ref. This also
means we can produce better
> | diagnostic.
>
> indeed. Assign it to me.
>
> -- Gaby
>
It's simple to move back to the awfull printing -- just add a case
for OBJ_TYPE_REF.
However, it is hard to fix this completely without, either
(a) having the front-end stop generating low-level three nodes;
(b) and/or moving to diagnostic with caret.
Adding the following to dump_expr():<case CALL_EXPR>
if (TREE_CODE (fn) == OBJ_TYPE_REF)
{
tree obj_type = TREE_TYPE (OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (fn));
int idx = tree_low_cst (OBJ_TYPE_REF_TOKEN (fn), 1);
fn = BINFO_VIRTUALS (TYPE_BINFO (TREE_TYPE (obj_type)));
while (idx--)
fn = TREE_CHAIN (fn);
fn = BV_FN (fn);
}
yields
22238.C: In member function 'void A::bar()':
22238.C:4: error: could not convert 'A::foo()' to 'bool'
(while an improvement, it is still suboptimal). Now, if you slightly
change the testcase to
struct A
{
virtual void foo();
};
struct B : virtual A {
void bar() { if (foo()) ; }
};
then you would get the awful
3.C: In member function 'void B::bar()':
3.C:7: error: could not convert '(((A*)this) +
(*(int*)(((B*)this)->B::<anonymous>.A::_vptr.A + -0x000000010)))->A::foo()' to
'bool'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-30 3:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2005-06-30 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 14:11 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-30 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-30 3:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2005-06-30 3:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-30 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-06-30 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-30 03:19 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 02:00 -------
| Confirmed, caused by the patch which introduced obj_type_ref. This also means we can produce better
| diagnostic.
indeed. Assign it to me.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 2:00 ` [Bug c++/22238] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-30 3:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-30 3:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-06-30 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-30 03:19 -------
Subject: Re: New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Since GCC 4.0.0 the compiler issues a hosed error message for the
| following invalid code snippet:
|
| ======================================
| struct A
| {
| virtual void foo();
| void bar() { if (foo()) ; }
| };
| ======================================
|
| The error message reads:
| bug.cc: In member function 'void A::bar()':
| bug.cc:4: error: could not convert '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by
| dump_expr#<expression error>(this)' to 'bool'
I think I crossed this silly behaviour from the error.c several types,
but it was always in a bigger context. Thanks for reducing it to this
small. I'll fix it.
| With GCC 3.4.4 I get
| bug.cc: In member function `void A::bar()':
| bug.cc:4: error: could not convert `(**((A*)this)->A::_vptr.A)(((A*)this))' to
| `bool'
| which is better, but not optimal.
Agreed.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 2:00 ` [Bug c++/22238] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-30 2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 3:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-30 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-30 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-30 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 02:00 -------
Confirmed, caused by the patch which introduced obj_type_ref. This also means we can produce better
diagnostic.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-30 02:00:07
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-21 20:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-22238-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 19:55 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 3:55 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-16 19:05 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-11-22 17:04 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 18:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 22:28 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 23:20 ` [Bug c++/22238] [4.0/4.1/4.2] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-17 23:40 ` [Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-17 23:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-21 19:56 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-21 20:27 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
2005-06-29 23:21 [Bug c++/22238] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] '#'obj_type_ref' not supported by dump_expr reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 2:00 ` [Bug c++/22238] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 3:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-30 3:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-30 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 14:11 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-27 16:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).