public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-13 16:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-13 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu           |
   GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu           |
   Target Milestone|4.1.0                       |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-13 16:24 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-10-31  4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P5
   Target Milestone|4.2.0                       |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-13 16:24 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31  4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-10-31  4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu  2005-10-31 04:15 -------
More data, the Linux kernel compiled for i686: 
size -f *
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
2625471  534012  611768 3771251  398b73 vmlinux.4.0
3023306  429364  347384 3800054  39fbf6 vmlinux.4.1

It would be good if someone else can try to reproduce this.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-10-31  4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-03  0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-02 22:55 -------
What are the flags for the sizes in comment #7 and comment #8? 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-03  0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2005-11-03  0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-11-03  0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu  2005-11-03 00:53 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> What are the flags for the sizes in comment #7 and comment #8? 

-O2 -march=i686


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-03  0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-11-03  0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2006-02-11 11:22 ` [Bug target/23153] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-11-05 22:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-11-03  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu  2005-11-03 00:59 -------
A very useful tool for comparing function sizes in 2 binaries/object file is:

 ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/bloat-o-meter

it displays the function names, the size, the size difference as absolute value
and percentage. It would even be nice to have something like this in
gcc/contrib.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-03  0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2006-02-11 11:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-11-05 22:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-11 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-11 11:22 -------
This is a meta-bug, which should never have a target milestone or a regression
marker.  A meta-bug is just a bug-bundler. The individual bugs can be
regressions but a meta-bug can't.  So, removing the regression marker.

BTW. note that only one of the remaining bugs hung from this meta-bug is still
a regression.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.1/4.2 Regression] [meta- |[meta-bug] code size
                   |bug] code size regression   |regression from 4.0 on x86
                   |from 4.0 on x86             |
   Target Milestone|4.1.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
       [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-11 11:22 ` [Bug target/23153] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-05 22:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-05 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-05 22:30 -------
All dependent bugs are resolved.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
  2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2005-08-19 22:06 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-09-13 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu  2005-09-13 23:09 -------
Additional data: 
For the testcase in PR8361:

 size -f generate-3.4*.o
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
 297025       4     181  297210   488fa generate-3.4-4.0.o
 318366       8     181  318555   4dc5b generate-3.4-4.1.o

so about a 7% increase for 4.1


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
  2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-08-19 22:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-19 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-19 21:54 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is there any reason that this PR is still in "UNCONFIRMED" state?
Because this really a meta-bug now.

And it looks like all the remaining issues are caused by:

2005-07-30  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>

        * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Do not load mem targets into register.
        * i386.c (ix86_fixup_binary_operands): Likewise.
        (ix86_expand_unary_operator): Likewise.
        (ix86_expand_fp_absneg_operator): Likewise.
        * optabs.c (expand_vec_cond_expr): Validate dest.

So this is target issue.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|21883                       |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|tree-optimization           |target
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-08-19 21:54:52
               date|                            |
            Summary|[4.1 Regression] code size  |[4.1 Regression] [meta-bug]
                   |regression from 4.0 on x86  |code size regression from
                   |                            |4.0 on x86


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-05 22:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 16:24 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31  4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03  0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-03  0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2006-02-11 11:22 ` [Bug target/23153] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-05 22:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-19 22:06 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).