public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] bitfield layout change (regression?) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:21:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051031072101.1662.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-22275-3760@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 07:21 ------- This was not a show stopper for GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.0. Why is it a show stopper now for GCC 4.1? And we can't unconditionally change it back now. We already have GCC 3.4 and 4.0 based compilers in production environments. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22275
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-31 7:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-22275-3760@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-10-17 15:09 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 3:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 7:21 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2005-10-31 7:44 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-31 17:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 23:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 23:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 16:42 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 16:44 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 19:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 17:19 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 2:34 ` [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 13:56 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 13:57 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 14:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:17 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 15:14 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-16 23:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 23:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 21:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 22:12 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-17 22:31 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-18 23:00 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-18 23:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 23:28 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-19 14:44 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-19 16:59 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-19 17:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 19:14 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-20 14:01 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-20 16:36 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-20 18:02 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-23 10:32 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 11:21 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 11:23 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 11:28 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-01-27 23:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 23:02 ` [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bitfield layout change steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 22:34 ` david dot moore at intel dot com 2006-02-11 0:14 ` david dot moore at intel dot com 2006-02-12 3:59 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-02-13 22:42 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 22:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 16:13 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 17:39 ` [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.2 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 12:20 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 12:24 ` matz at suse dot de 2006-02-15 12:25 ` [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02 9:00 [Bug c/22275] New: bitfield layout change (regression?) marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2005-07-02 15:08 ` [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 21:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 16:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20051031072101.1662.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).