From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1701 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2005 07:21:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1663 invoked by uid 48); 31 Oct 2005 07:21:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051031072101.1662.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] bitfield layout change (regression?) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg04112.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 07:21 ------- This was not a show stopper for GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.0. Why is it a show stopper now for GCC 4.1? And we can't unconditionally change it back now. We already have GCC 3.4 and 4.0 based compilers in production environments. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22275