From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19209 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2005 16:42:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19182 invoked by uid 48); 1 Nov 2005 16:42:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051101164246.19181.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] bitfield layout change (regression?) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janis at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #11 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 16:42 ------- A regression hunt identified the following patch: r65207 | jason | 2003-04-03 18:23:04 +0000 (Thu, 03 Apr 2003) | 17 lines * stor-layout.c (do_type_align): New fn, split out from... (layout_decl): ...here. Do all alignment calculations for FIELD_DECLs here. (update_alignment_for_field): Not here. (start_record_layout, debug_rli): Remove unpadded_align. * tree.h (struct record_layout_info_s): Remove unpadded_align. * c-decl.c (finish_enum): Don't set DECL_SIZE, DECL_ALIGN or DECL_MODE on the CONST_DECLs. (finish_struct): Don't mess with DECL_ALIGN. * cp/class.c (build_vtable): Set DECL_ALIGN here. (get_vtable_decl): Not here. (layout_vtable_decl): Or here. (create_vtable_ptr): Or here. (layout_class_type): Or here. (check_bitfield_decl): Don't mess with field alignment. * ada/misc.c (gnat_adjust_rli): #if 0. -- janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22275