From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11007 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2005 22:00:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10965 invoked by uid 48); 1 Nov 2005 22:00:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051101220015.10964.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/23109] [4.1 Regression] compiler generates wrong code leading to spurious division by zero with -funsafe-math-optimizations (instead of -ftrapping-math) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 22:00 ------- It is a showstopper, but a patch has been ready for months... I admit the patch is non-trivial, but the testcases are comprehensive. Maybe it's best to wait until the branch and backport it a week later. But I don't think so. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23109