From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19864 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2005 17:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19850 invoked by uid 48); 3 Nov 2005 17:04:11 -0000 Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051103170411.19849.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/24657] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] bizarre diagnostic on valid (?) constructor In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 17:04 ------- I tested a few different versions of gcc and added the results to known to work/fail. 3.3.3 accepted this code. before in 3.2.3 (and below), the error message was : t.cc:6: declaration of `void A::i()' t.cc:4: changes meaning of `i' from `int i' I don't know if this is valid or not, the issue is a namelookup issue. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail|2.95.3 3.0.4 3.4.0 4.0.0 |2.95.3 3.0.4 3.4.0 4.0.0 |4.1.0 |4.1.0 3.2.3 Summary|bizarre diagnostic on valid |[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] |(?) constructor |bizarre diagnostic on valid | |(?) constructor Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24657