public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/22495] Different ideas about .true. and .false.
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051105230618.23598.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-22495-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-05 23:06 -------
I did some further research, and while g77 didn't seem to have documented any
of the details of how LOGICALs are implemented, we have the following in
gfortran.texi:755:
----
@node Implicitly interconvert LOGICAL and INTEGER
@section Implicitly interconvert LOGICAL and INTEGER
@cindex Implicitly interconvert LOGICAL and INTEGER

As a GNU extension for backwards compatibility with other compilers,
@command{gfortran} allows the implicit conversion of LOGICALs to INTEGERs
and vice versa.  When converting from a LOGICAL to an INTEGER, the numeric
value of @code{.FALSE.} is zero, and that of @code{.TRUE.} is one.  When
converting from INTEGER to LOGICAL, the value zero is interpreted as
@code{.FALSE.} and any nonzero value is interpreted as @code{.TRUE.}.
----
And this is indeed true and consistent with what g77 does:
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/tests> cat ugly.f
      LOGICAL L
      DO i=0,5
        L = i
        PRINT *, l
      END DO
      END
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/tests> gfortran ugly.f
 In file ugly.f:3

  L = i
     1
Warning: Extension: Conversion from INTEGER(4) to LOGICAL(4) at (1)
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/tests> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/usr/lib ./a.out
 F
 T
 T
 T
 T
 T
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/tests> g77 ugly.f -fugly-logint
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/tests> ./a.out
 F
 T
 T
 T
 T
 T
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/tests> 

(The INTEGER -> LOGICAL conversion is implemented as "i = l != 0" as verified
by looking in the tree dumps.)
I think we should be consistent.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22495


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-05 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-22495-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-01 21:30 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-01 21:36 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 12:37 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-05 22:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-05 23:06 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-11-05 23:20 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-06  0:02 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-06  0:22 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-06  0:23 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-06  0:32 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-06 15:01 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-29 23:30 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-30  0:52 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-30  6:44 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15  8:52 [Bug fortran/22495] New: " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15 22:19 ` [Bug fortran/22495] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051105230618.23598.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).