public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase
       [not found] <bug-20656-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-11-08  0:30 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-09  3:45 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-15 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-08  0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-08 00:30 -------
Seen at test-case reduction also for code of the form:
int i; for (i = 1; i <= shift_size; i++) { }
not producing the same ICE as for:
int i; i = 1 <= shift_size ? shift_size : 1;
(I'll put a pointer here to the complete test-case in due time.)


-- 

hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase
       [not found] <bug-20656-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-11-08  0:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-09  3:45 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-15 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-09  3:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-09 03:45 -------
Referring to comment #2, the test-case for PR 24750 has a few similar loops and
a few other PR references that seems relevant.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase
       [not found] <bug-20656-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-11-08  0:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-09  3:45 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-15 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-15 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-15 19:14 -------
Fixed on the mainline now (I don't know what by).


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase
  2005-03-27 19:13 [Bug tree-optimization/20656] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-06 18:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20656] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-27 13:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-27 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 20656 depends on bug 22325, which changed state.

Bug 22325 Summary: missed optimization in loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22325

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase
  2005-03-27 19:13 [Bug tree-optimization/20656] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-06 18:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-27 13:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-06 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-06 18:50 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-04-06 18:50:25
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-15 19:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-20656-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-08  0:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-09  3:45 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-27 19:13 [Bug tree-optimization/20656] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-06 18:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/20656] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-27 13:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).