From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28517 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2005 00:30:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28485 invoked by uid 48); 8 Nov 2005 00:30:50 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051108003050.28484.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg01037.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 00:30 ------- Seen at test-case reduction also for code of the form: int i; for (i = 1; i <= shift_size; i++) { } not producing the same ICE as for: int i; i = 1 <= shift_size ? shift_size : 1; (I'll put a pointer here to the complete test-case in due time.) -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656