From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1281 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2005 20:39:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1265 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2005 20:39:36 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051116203936.1264.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/24902] COMPLEX_ASSIGN is wrong In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg02386.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-11-16 20:39 ------- Subject: Re: COMPLEX_ASSIGN is wrong "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" writes: [...] | > Subject: Re: COMPLEX_ASSIGN is wrong | > | > "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: | > | > | I should also note that: | > | http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Complex.html#Complex | > | | > | recomends against using the extensions anyways. | > | > Exactly which sentence says so? | | "you should use the ISO C99 function" every time it mentions the | extenstions. (1) that is not the same as recommending against the extension; (2) how do you use ISO C99 functions to implement C99 , C++98 that interoperate with C99 _Complex and other libraries that predate C99 functions or on plateforms where C99 functions don't exist but the libraries need to be implemented anyway? -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24902