From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18415 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2005 23:04:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 18392 invoked by uid 48); 16 Nov 2005 23:04:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051116230400.18391.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/24908] ICE in dwarf2out for cpu2000 with -funroll-loops -fno-tree-copyrename In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amodra at bigpond dot net dot au" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg02404.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-16 23:04 ------- .ce3 (insn/f 81 80 82 0 /src/tmp/24908.c:11 (set (reg:SI 12 12) (reg:SI 65 lr)) -1 (nil) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 65 lr) (expr_list:REG_MAYBE_DEAD (const_int 0 [0x0]) (nil)))) (insn 82 81 83 0 /src/tmp/24908.c:11 (set (reg:SI 65 lr) (unspec:SI [ (const_int 0 [0x0]) ] 7)) -1 (nil) (expr_list:REG_MAYBE_DEAD (const_int 0 [0x0]) (nil))) ====== .rnreg (insn/f 81 80 82 0 /src/tmp/24908.c:11 (set (reg:SI 26 26) (reg:SI 65 lr)) 282 {*movsi_internal1} (nil) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 65 lr) (expr_list:REG_MAYBE_DEAD (const_int 0 [0x0]) (nil)))) (insn 82 81 83 0 /src/tmp/24908.c:11 (set (reg:SI 65 lr) (unspec:SI [ (const_int 0 [0x0]) ] 7)) 372 {load_toc_v4_pic_si} (nil) (expr_list:REG_MAYBE_DEAD (const_int 0 [0x0]) (nil))) I think the assert in dwarf2out.c is wrong, that's all. rnreg is doing something perfectly ok, even if possibly unnecessary, and dwarf2out gets its knickers in a knot. -- amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-11-16 23:04:00 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24908