public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
[not found] <bug-22575-7667@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-11-18 0:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-18 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 00:55 -------
This is a dup of bug 4131.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4131 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4131 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-21 2:35 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-07-21 23:11 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-07-21 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-21 23:00 -------
No, icc puts it into bss and runs code to initialize it with 7:
.bss
.align 4
.globl _ZN3obj5sevenE
_ZN3obj5sevenE:
.type _ZN3obj5sevenE,@object
.size _ZN3obj5sevenE,4
.space 4 # pad
.data
.align 4
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 20:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-21 2:35 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-07-21 23:11 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-07-21 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-21 02:08 -------
Does ICC put this in .rodata?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 19:50 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-07-20 20:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-21 2:35 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-07-21 23:11 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-20 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords| |missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 19:49 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-07-20 19:50 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-07-20 20:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-07-20 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-20 19:49:01
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-07-20 19:49 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-07-20 19:50 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-07-20 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:48 -------
This is a valid bug, however hard it may be to solve (see PR 4131).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
2005-07-20 18:45 ` [Bug c++/22575] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:58 ` schlie at comcast dot net
@ 2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-07-20 19:49 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-07-20 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:47 -------
*** Bug 4131 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |k_satoda at f2 dot dion dot
| |ne dot jp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
2005-07-20 18:45 ` [Bug c++/22575] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-20 18:58 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: schlie at comcast dot net @ 2005-07-20 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-20 18:57 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4131 ***
Please correct me if I misunderstand, but it doen't seem reasonable to
close this bug as won't fix, based on it being difficult to fix for v2.95?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section.
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
@ 2005-07-20 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:58 ` schlie at comcast dot net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-20 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20 18:44 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4131 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-18 0:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-22575-7667@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-18 0:55 ` [Bug c++/22575] immutable object placed in .bss section pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:45 [Bug c++/22575] New: " pluto at agmk dot net
2005-07-20 18:45 ` [Bug c++/22575] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-20 18:58 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-07-20 19:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-07-20 19:49 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-07-20 19:50 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-07-20 20:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-21 2:35 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-07-21 23:11 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).