public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/17972] [3.4 Regression] const/pure functions result in bad asm Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051121051648.31555.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-17972-7332@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #38 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 05:16 ------- > Eric, do you still consider this problem important to be solved for 3.4.x? As the saying goes in French: "ne soyons pas plus royaliste que le roi". The C++ maintainers apparenty don't care much, then neither do I anymore. > Do you have a new version of your proposed patch? No, I've stopped working on this months ago. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17972
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-21 5:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-17972-7332@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-11-21 2:21 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 5:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2005-11-21 10:41 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 12:47 [Bug c++/17972] New: " mostrows at watson dot ibm dot com 2004-10-15 23:12 ` [Bug c++/17972] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-16 2:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-16 10:58 ` amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-01 0:45 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 17:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 23:32 ` amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-07 8:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07 8:30 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 19:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 19:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 19:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 17:10 ` mostrows at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-02-24 19:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-03 18:47 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-03 19:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-03 19:34 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-03 21:12 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-03 21:19 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-03 22:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-07 9:54 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 8:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-12 16:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 17:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20051121051648.31555.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).