From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23761 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2005 15:49:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 23753 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2005 15:49:36 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051121154936.23752.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/24947] -Os should maximize inlining --param values. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg02985.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 15:49 ------- Subject: Re: -Os should maximize inlining --param values. I didn't say the compiler shouldn't say anything, I said it shouldn't be fatal. Regardless of whether or not you think the limits are too low, others may disagree and not want to change them. That doesn't mean that the compiler should reject their code because the limit has been exceeded. This is not something that should cause -Werror to refuse compilation.. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24947