public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051122191806.31176.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #5 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-22 19:18 -------
Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C
scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 15:39 +0000, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 15:39 -------
> This test has changed from XFAIL to XPASS for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu between
> 20051120 (I don't have the exact revision number; the datestamp implies 107240
> or later) and 20051122 (revision 107356). gcc-testresults shows it XPASSing in
> various revisions from 107316 onwards. Perhaps this issue is fixed?
It's possible Jan's patch is making this work. However, I'd rather
see Richard Guenther's patch (or an equivalent) installed before we
really consider this issue resolved.
The two patches attack the same class of problems, but there are cases
where Jan's patch will do better and there are cases where Richard's
patch will do better.
jeff
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-10 4:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 15:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 19:18 ` law at redhat dot com [this message]
2005-11-22 19:46 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 21:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-07 18:34 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 17:06 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:08 [Bug tree-optimization/21655] New: [4.1 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-21 14:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051122191806.31176.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).