public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-11-30 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-12 18:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-30 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:51 -------
Note fixing this will also fix PR 23666 after my patch for moving "- ~a = a+1"
to negate_expr.
But this needs to depend on the fix for PR 25125 since otherwise we expose a
latent bug in convert.c which shows up in the testsuite.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |25125
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-30 16:51 ` [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-12 18:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-13 1:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-12 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 18:10 -------
Didn't we have the canonicalization to put the constant in operand2 if
possible? A lot of transformations rely on that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-30 16:51 ` [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-12 18:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-13 1:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-22 14:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-13 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 01:01 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Didn't we have the canonicalization to put the constant in operand2 if
> possible? A lot of transformations rely on that.
Why should they in this case, they only rely on that for operations that are
comunitive and minus is not. "(-5) - a" is simplier than -a - 5 in reality.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-13 1:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-22 14:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-22 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-22 14:45 -------
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-02-18 17:40:06 |2006-10-22 14:45:16
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-23 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-23 07:19 -------
Subject: Bug 23295
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 23 07:19:34 2006
New Revision: 117969
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117969
Log:
2006-10-24 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/27132
PR middle-end/23295
* builtins.c (fold_binary): Remove checks for flag_wrapv
and flag_trapv where negate_expr_p covers these cases.
* gcc.dg/pr27132.c: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/pr23295.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23294.c: Adjust patterns.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C: Likewise.
2006-10-23 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/29548
* fold-const.c (fold_plusminus_mult_expr): Check exact power
of two on the absolute value.
(fold_binary): Fold x * -C to -x * C if x is easily negatable
and negating -C does not overflow.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr23295.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr27132.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23294.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-22 14:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-23 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-23 07:20 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
2005-08-09 3:12 [Bug middle-end/23295] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-09 4:26 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-09 4:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-09 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-09 04:44 -------
I am going to move this to minor as this could be considered a regression in a way.
It was introduced by:
(fold): Optimize "-A - B" as "-B - A" if overflow wraps around.
But in a way since wrapv is false, that means overflow is undefined and can be either wraps or anything
else.
Maybe Roger can comment on this?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
Severity|enhancement |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
2005-08-09 3:12 [Bug middle-end/23295] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-09 4:26 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 4:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-09 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-09 04:26 -------
This transformation is done with -fwrapv.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-09 04:26:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
2005-08-09 3:12 [Bug middle-end/23295] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:12 ` [Bug middle-end/23295] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-09 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-09 03:31 -------
Oh, and we remove one gimplfier tempary variable too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
2005-08-09 3:12 [Bug middle-end/23295] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:12 ` [Bug middle-end/23295] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 4:26 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 4:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-09 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-09 03:31 -------
And then we can get optimial rtl generation right away for PPC:
(insn 20 17 26 0 (set (reg/i:SI 3 r3 [ <result> ])
(minus:SI (const_int -5 [0xfffffffffffffffb])
(reg:SI 3 r3 [ a ]))) 78 {*rs6000.md:1236} (nil)
(nil))
If we expand it correctly instead of depending on combine :).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a
2005-08-09 3:12 [Bug middle-end/23295] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-09 3:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-09 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-09 03:12 -------
This is done in simplify-rtx.c for the rtl level.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |19986
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-23 7:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-23295-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-30 16:51 ` [Bug middle-end/23295] fold does not simplify -a - (5) to (-5) - a pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-12 18:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-13 1:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-22 14:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-23 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:12 [Bug middle-end/23295] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:12 ` [Bug middle-end/23295] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 3:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 4:26 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-09 4:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).