[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-10  4:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-22 15:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-10  4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-10 04:54 -------
This has been xfailed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization, xfail
   Last reconfirmed|2005-05-21 14:03:59         |2005-10-10 04:54:37
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-10  4:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 15:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-22 19:18 ` law at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-22 15:39 -------
This test has changed from XFAIL to XPASS for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu between
20051120 (I don't have the exact revision number; the datestamp implies 107240
or later) and 20051122 (revision 107356).  gcc-testresults shows it XPASSing in
various revisions from 107316 onwards.  Perhaps this issue is fixed?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-10  4:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-22 15:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 19:18 ` law at redhat dot com
  2005-11-22 19:46 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2005-11-22 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from law at redhat dot com  2005-11-22 19:18 -------
Subject: Re:  g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C
        scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 15:39 +0000, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> 
> ------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-22 15:39 -------
> This test has changed from XFAIL to XPASS for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu between
> 20051120 (I don't have the exact revision number; the datestamp implies 107240
> or later) and 20051122 (revision 107356).  gcc-testresults shows it XPASSing in
> various revisions from 107316 onwards.  Perhaps this issue is fixed?
It's possible Jan's patch is making this work.  However, I'd rather
see Richard Guenther's patch (or an equivalent) installed before we
really consider this issue resolved.

The two patches attack the same class of problems, but there are cases
where Jan's patch will do better and there are cases where Richard's
patch will do better.

jeff


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-22 19:18 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2005-11-22 19:46 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-30 21:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-22 19:46 -------
FWIW, I can help narrowing the range of revisions:
XFAILed for cris-*-* and mmix-knuth-mmixware with
"Mon Nov 21 03:58:26 UTC 2005 (revision 107276M)", XPASSing since
"Tue Nov 22 00:42:24 UTC 2005 (revision 107345M)".


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-22 19:46 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-30 21:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-30 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-30 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-30 21:07 -------
Subject: Bug 21655

Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 30 21:07:10 2005
New Revision: 107739

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107739
Log:
2005-11-30  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/21655
        * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C: Remove XFAIL.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-30 21:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-30 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-07 18:34 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-13 17:06 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-30 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-30 21:09 -------
Fixed in 4.2.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-30 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-07 18:34 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-13 17:06 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-07 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-07 18:33 -------
This test is still XPASS'ing everywhere on 4.1, may I backport this?

2005-11-30  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/21655
        * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C: Remove XFAIL.

Recent results from Jan/Feb:
x86_64: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00469.html
ia64: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00451.html
s390x: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00421.html
s390: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00411.html
powerpc64: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00406.html
i686: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00365.html
m68k: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00073.html
hppa: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01317.html
arm: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00996.html
sparc: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00836.html
mips: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00845.html
i486: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00835.html
alpha: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00833.html
hppa64: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00077.html
hppa2.0w: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00025.html

That's enough, yes? :-)


-- 

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
       [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-02-07 18:34 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-13 17:06 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-13 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-13 17:05 -------
Subject: Bug 21655

Author: ghazi
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:04:46 2008
New Revision: 132289

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132289
Log:
        Backport:
        2005-11-30  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/21655
        * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C: Remove XFAIL.


Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] New: [4.1 Regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
@ 2005-05-18 21:08 jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-18 21:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-21 14:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-18 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
appeared on mainline, most or all platforms, 20050518.  This is a new testcase
but presumptively a regression because bug 14814 was reportedly fixed in 4.0.0.

-- 
           Summary: [4.1 Regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-
                    dump-times &this 0 fails
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
  2005-05-18 21:08 [Bug tree-optimization/21655] New: [4.1 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-18 21:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-21 14:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-18 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-18 21:13 -------
No just the testcase is failing, the problem described in PR 14814 is still fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at gcc dot gnu dot org
            Summary|[4.1 Regression]            |g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C
                   |g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C   |scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
                   |scan-tree-dump-times &this 0|fails
                   |fails                       |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails
  2005-05-18 21:08 [Bug tree-optimization/21655] New: [4.1 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-18 21:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-21 14:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-21 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-21 14:03 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-05-21 14:03:59
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21655


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-13 17:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-21655-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-10  4:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 15:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 19:18 ` law at redhat dot com
2005-11-22 19:46 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 21:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-07 18:34 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 17:06 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:08 [Bug tree-optimization/21655] New: [4.1 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21655] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-21 14:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).