From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28293 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2005 20:29:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 28264 invoked by uid 48); 4 Dec 2005 20:29:32 -0000 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051204202932.28263.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #49 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-04 20:29 ------- (In reply to comment #48) > (In reply to comment #47) > > Any reason why libsupc++ can't include the stuff in config/ ? > > I'm interested in seeing this bug go, I'd work on it. > > I'm also interested, of course. In principle, libspuc++ can certainly do that, > but you have to investigate a bit the best way to do that, consistently with > the rest of the library. In fact, the libsupc++ files are *already* including , which is all we need. The problem in eh_globals.cc (also elsewhere? An audit is in order) seems only that it's included too late. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773