From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5604 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2005 22:26:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 5593 invoked by uid 48); 7 Dec 2005 22:26:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051207222639.5592.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/25304] std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00773.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 22:26 ------- Related to PR 16505. This is the same issue as PR 16505. Can someone close to the standard answer the question why did they change the return type for these functions? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304